Wikipedia

Johann Gottlieb Fichte

Johann Gottlieb Fichte (German: [ˈjoːhan ˈɡɔtliːp ˈfɪçtə]; Mey 19, 1762 – Januar 27, 1814), a German filosofer, acame a foondin figur o the filosofical muivement kent as German idealism, which developed frae the theoretical an ethical writins o Immanuel Kant. Recently, filosofers an scholars hae begun tae appreciate Fichte as an important filosofer in his ain richt due tae his oreeginal insichts into the naitur o sel-consciousness or sel-awareness.[13] Fichte wis an aa the oreeginator o thesis–antithesis–synthesis (Thesis–Antithesis–Synthesis),[4] an idea that is eften erroneously attributit tae Hegel.[23] Lik Descartes an Kant afore him, Fichte wis motivated bi the problem o subjectivity an consciousness. Fichte an aa wrote wirks o poleetical filosofie; he haes a reputation as ane o the faithers o German naitionalism.

Johann Gottlieb Fichte
Born19 Mey 1762(1762-05-19)
Rammenau, Saxony
Dee'd27 Januar 1814(1814-01-27) (aged 51)
Berlin, Proushie
NaitionalityGerman
EddicationSchulpforta
Alma materVarsity o Jena
(1780; na degree)
Leipzig Varsity
(1781–1784; na degree)
Era18t-century filosofie
RegionWastren Filosofie
SchuilGerman idealism
Post-Kantian transcendental idealism[1]
Jena Romanticism
Romantic naitionalism[2]
InstitutionsVarsity o Jena
Varsity o Erlangen
Varsity o Berlin
Main interests
Sel-consciousness an sel-awareness, moral filosofie, poleetical filosofie
Notable ideas
Das absolute Bewusstseyn (the absolute consciousness),[3] Thesis–Antithesis–Synthesis (thesis–antithesis–synthesis),[4] Nicht-Ich (the not-I), das Streben (strivin), gegenseitig anerkennen (mutual recogneetion), Wissenschaftslehre (Doctrine o Science), der Satz der Wechselbestimmbarkeit (the Principle o Reciprocal Determination),[5] coinin the terms Real-Idealismus ("real-idealism") andIdeal-Realismus ("ideal-realism") tae chairacterise Wissenschaftslehre (his ain version o transcendental idealism),[6][7] filosofie pragmatic history o the human spirit (pragmatische Geschichte des menschlichen Geistes),[8] Anstoss (impulse), Tathandlung (fact an/or act), Aufforderung (cryin, summons), intellectual intueetion,[9] the primacy o the practical (Handeln),[10][11][12]
Urtrieb (oreeginal drive),
"Fichte's oreeginal insicht,"[13]
the pouer o productive imaigination as an oreeginal pouer o the mynd[14][15]

References

eedit
  1. ↑ Nectarios G. Limnatis, German Idealism and the Problem of Knowledge: Kant, Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel, Springer, 2008, pp. 138, 177.
  2. ↑ Kerrigan, William Thomas (1997), "Young America": Romantic Nationalism in Literature and Politics, 1843–1861, University of Michigan, 1997, p. 150.
  3. ↑ "Fichte in Berlin to Schelling in Jena, May 31–August 7[8?], 1801," in: Michael Vater and David W. Wood (eds. and trs.), The Philosophical Rupture between Fichte and Schelling: Selected Texts and Correspondence (1800-1802), SUNY Press, 2012, p. 56.
  4. ↑ a b "Review o Aenesidemus" ("Rezension des Aenesidemus", de [Allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung], Februar 11–12, 1794). Trans. Daniel Breazeale. In Breazeale, Daniel; Fichte, Johann (1993). Fichte: Early Philosophical Writings. Cornell University Press. p. 63. (See an aa: FTP, p. 46; Breazeale 1980–81, pp. 545–68; Breazeale and Rockmore 1994, p. 19; Breazeale 2013, pp. 36–37; Waibel, Breazeale, Rockmore 2010, p. 157: "Fichte believes that the I must be grasped as the unity of synthesis and analysis.")
  5. ↑ The Principle o Reciprocal Determination is the principle that, accordin tae Fichte (Wissenschaftslehre nova methodo, "Halle Nachschrift," 1796/1797), expleecitly guides aw filosofical reflection; it is derived frae the reciprocally determinable relationship atween the finite I an its ither. In a similar way, Fichte haed derived in his Foondations o the Science o Knawledge (publ. 1794/1795, paras. 1–2) the logical laws o identity an non-contradiction frae the oreeginal positin an coonter-positin o the I. (See Breazeale 2013, pp. 54–5.)
  6. ↑ Grundlage der gesamten Wissenschaftslehre, 1794/1795, p. 274.
  7. ↑ Breazeale 2013, pp. 305 and 308 n. 24.
  8. ↑ Gesamtausgabe I/2: 364–65; Daniel Breazeale, "Fichte's Conception of Philosophy as a "Pragmatic History of the Human Mind" and the Contributions of Kant, Platner, and Maimon," Journal of the History of Ideas, 62(4), Oct. 2001, pp. 685–703; Zöller 1998, p. 130 n. 30; Sedgwick 2007, p. 144 n. 33; Breazeale and Rockmore 2010, p. 50 n. 27: "Α »history of the human mind« is a genetic account of the self-constitution of the I in the form of an ordered description of the various acts of thinking that are presupposed by the act of thinking the I"; Posesorski 2012, p. 81: "Pragmatische Geschichte des menschlichen Geistes designates reason's timeless course of production of the different levels of the a priori system of all knowledge, which are exclusively uncovered and portrayed genetically by personal self-conscious reflection"; Breazeale 2013, p. 72.
  9. ↑ Gesamtausgabe II/3: 24–25; Breazeale 2013, p. 198.
  10. ↑ Fichte, J. G., "Zweite Einleitung in die Wissenschaftslehre" ("Second Introduction to the Wissenschaftslehre"; 1797); Rocío Zambrana, Hegel's Theory of Intelligibility, University of Chicago Press, 2015, p. 151 n. 15.
  11. ↑ FTP, p. 365; Waibel, Breazeale, Rockmore 2010, p. 157; Breazeale 2013, pp. 354 and 404–439.
  12. ↑ Cf. KpV A219.
  13. ↑ a b Dieter Henrich, "Fichte's Original Insight", Contemporary German Philosophy 1 (1982[1966]), ed. bi Darrel E. Christensen et al., pp. 15–52 (translation o Henrich, Dieter (1966), "Fichtes ursprüngliche Einsicht", in: Subjektivität und Metaphysik. Festschrift für Wolfgang Cramer eedited bi D. Henrich und H. Wagner, Frankfurt/M., pp. 188–232). Henrich's airticle is an analysis o the follaein three presentations o the Wissenschaftslehre: Grundlage der gesamten Wissenschaftslehre (Foondations o the Science o Knawledge, 1794/1795), Versuch einer neuen Darstellung der Wissenschaftslehre (An Attempt a New Presentation o the Wissenschaftslehre, 1797/1798), an Darstellung der Wissenschaftslehre (Presentation o the Wissenschaftslehre, 1801).
  14. ↑ Fichte's concept o productive imaigination is based on Immanuel Kant's distinction atween productive imagination which explains the possibility o cogneetion o a priori, an the reproductive imaigination that explains the synthesis o empirical laws (KrV B152).
  15. ↑ a b Breazeale, Dan, "Johann Gottlieb Fichte", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/johann-fichte/>.
  16. ↑ Fichte wrote that his admiration for Maimon's talent "[k]nows no limit," an an aa that "Maimon has completely overturned the entire Kantian philosophy as it has been understood by everyone until now." (Gesamtausgabe III/2: 275)
  17. ↑ Breazeale 2013, p. 23.
  18. ↑ Breazeale 2013, p. 2.
  19. ↑ Breazeale 2013, p. 308.
  20. ↑ Breazeale 2013, p. 94.
  21. ↑ Maier, S. (2009). "Der Einfluss der Fichteschen Philosophie in der Medizin bei Adolph Karl August Eschenmayer Archived 2012-12-23 at the Wayback Machine. Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen: Medizinische Fakultät.
  22. ↑ Breazeale and Rockmore 2010: David Kenosian, "Fichtean Elements in Wilhelm von Humboldt's Philosophy of Language", esp. p. 357.
  23. ↑ Robert C. Solomon, In the Spirit of Hegel, Oxford University Press, p. 23.

Soorces

  • Daniel Breazeale. Thinking Through the Wissenschaftslehre: Themes from Fichte's Early Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Taen frae "https://sco.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johann_Gottlieb_Fichte&oldid=858939"