Walcome! eedit

Hullo, JayCoactus, an walcome til the Wikipedie! Guid tae see ye. Thank ye for yer contribution. Some gibbles ye'll find uissfu:

Bi gaun throu the Commontie Yett ye'll can find aw kynd o wittins adae wi uisin an eikin til the Wikipedie. For tae hae a sey shottie, veesit oor Saundpit.

Dinna haud yer wheesht, haud yer ain!MJLTauk 05:32, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Cundeez eedit

Hey, a've addit a cleanup tag tae a page ye creatit, The Cundeez, as pairts ae the airticle seem tae hae been taen stracht fae the SLC airticle referenced. Compare yer edit "Anither kenspeckle o the baund is thair uiss o the Dundonian dialect o Scots, melled wi the sangs, used in a gleg, humorous an skeely wey. Cundeez is taen fae the word cundie, meanin syver or stank, that’s oreeginal is sprung fae the Frainch conduit." an the SLC airticle "Anither kenspeckle o the baund is thair uiss o the Dundonian dialect o Scots, melled wi the sangs, used in a gleg, humorous an skeely wey (whaur ither cuid ye get ‘Murder on the Oary Express’?) an pairt an paircel o the baund’s Dundee-steidit identity. The name Cundeez is taen fae the Scots word cundie, anither wey o sayin syver or stank, that’s oreeginal is sprung fae the Frainch conduit." A'm hinkin the wey soorces ur currently uised in the airticle maks verification trickier as weel, as it's nae instanter clear fit soorce is bein uised tae back up fit claims CiphriusKane (tauk) 20:47, 24 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry to have caused trouble there, I'll promise not to do that again. For some reason I was under the impression that this Wiki had an agreement with the Scots Language Centre to use their content; not sure why I thought that actually. I will try and reformat things better in the future as well. --JayCoactus (tauk) 05:22, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
We've haed some contact wi the SLC, but thay'll hae a different copyricht license fae us. Ye're free tae uise em as a reference tho. The Cundeez haes been rewritten tae remuive the copyrichtit content, but a've addit a few soorces fur biggin up the airticle again. As fur trouble, it happens an naebody's perfect, sae a widnae fash aboot it. A'm howpin ye'll stick aroon, cause we're needin editors CiphriusKane (tauk) 16:57, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Attribution eedit

Hey there. A've taen a wee keek at a few airticles ye creatit, lik Auchenbowie Hoose, an it seems ye've been owersettin airticles fae the Ingels Wikipedia intae Scots athoot attribution. Unner enwiki's CC BY-SA policy, remixin an redistributin thair airticles (sic as owersettin em intae Scots an pittin en on scowiki) is alloued, sae lang as attribution is gien. It's seemple enouch, jist airtin the Ingels airticle ye're uisin as a base, or pit {{Translatit page}} on the scowiki tauk page CiphriusKane (tauk) 01:48, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry but that's not true -- the English Wikipedia article on Auchenbowie House was translated from the Scots version I created here. --JayCoactus (tauk) 05:21, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Sae it wis, sae a apologise fur mah mistak. Still, there wis ainither case in Flanders. A see ye did try rewritin the airticle, that is appreciatit, but it's still clear aat pairts ae it ar taen fae the enwiki airticle, but it's naehing major, jist summat tae keep in mind fur future CiphriusKane (tauk) 16:57, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply